# Remote-operations packet manifest

Version: public v1
Audience: VaultDesk and governed remote-action teams

## Summary
This manifest defines the smallest serious packet for buyers entering through the entry product and evaluating governed remote action before broader platform expansion.

Route: VaultDesk evaluation (/vaultdesk)
Docs: https://docs.g14.ai/use-cases/governed-remote-operations
Blueprint: Governed remote operations (https://docs.g14.ai/reference-architectures/governed-remote-operations)

## Inspection burden
- Confirm the VaultDesk product proof before the conversation expands into broader platform questions.
- Clarify the endpoint-local trust model, operator-visible control, and evidence path for remote action.
- Reduce the next move to product evaluation, technical briefing, or a broader platform discussion.

## Stack anchors
- Atlas Mission Control carries the remote mission packet, runtime state, and hold-point progression.
- Apollo exposes human review and command when remote action must stay attributable and governed.
- Lamina and release control preserve receipts, closure, and disciplined expansion after the remote action ends.

## Briefing fit
- Use the product briefing when you still need the remote-action proof reduced to one focused architecture conversation.
- Move into product evaluation when the packet already answered the proof question and the remaining issue is hands-on trust in the surface itself.
- Expand into a broader platform discussion only if the packet shows the entry product is already understood and the broader platform question is now the real issue.

## Public-safe artifacts
- VaultDesk product proof and runtime boundary
- Operator-visible control and endpoint-local trust model
- Evidence and release path for remote action
- Route to product evaluation versus platform expansion

## Custody checks
- Packet stays product-scoped until broader platform depth is actually necessary.
- Packet delivery preserves owner, audience, and the next product step.
- Any expansion into platform diligence is an explicit step, not an accident.

## Decision outcomes
- Proceed to product briefing
  Choose this when you still need one live walkthrough of the product proof, remote-action boundary, and attributable control path before evaluation.
- Proceed to product evaluation
  Choose this when the packet already made the product proof credible and the next move is hands-on rather than another abstract conversation.
- Move into platform review
  Choose this only when the entry product is already clear and the real unresolved question is broader platform fit.

## Next moves
- Product evaluation
- Technical briefing
- Platform review

## Protected boundary
- No private endpoint runbooks
- No protected operational thresholds
- No unreleased expansion surfaces